Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wanted pages"
From SVR Wiki
(Suggest only doing individual pages for hired locos, not gala visitors) |
m (Agreeing with Robin) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We have individual loco pages now for most of the hired locos, so it would make sense to complete 3802, 44871, 73129 and 92214. I would suggest not creating pages for 30777, 7029, and 92220 which were just gala visitors, unless we want to embark on a creating page for every other gala visitor as well. I will delete the links for now but if anyone feels they should be created, please reinstate them and carry on. --[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 20:38, 7 April 2018 (UTC) | We have individual loco pages now for most of the hired locos, so it would make sense to complete 3802, 44871, 73129 and 92214. I would suggest not creating pages for 30777, 7029, and 92220 which were just gala visitors, unless we want to embark on a creating page for every other gala visitor as well. I will delete the links for now but if anyone feels they should be created, please reinstate them and carry on. --[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 20:38, 7 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Agreed, I had thought about doing one page for the three 5600 Class hires, but followed the convention of a page for each. I haven't (as the 5700 Class ones have got - 5764/7714/7760 etc.) put the same Class description in each one though, just referred in 5619/5643/6695 to a description of the Class in 6634's page.--[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 20:44, 7 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:44, 7 April 2018
We have individual loco pages now for most of the hired locos, so it would make sense to complete 3802, 44871, 73129 and 92214. I would suggest not creating pages for 30777, 7029, and 92220 which were just gala visitors, unless we want to embark on a creating page for every other gala visitor as well. I will delete the links for now but if anyone feels they should be created, please reinstate them and carry on. --Robin (talk) 20:38, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed, I had thought about doing one page for the three 5600 Class hires, but followed the convention of a page for each. I haven't (as the 5700 Class ones have got - 5764/7714/7760 etc.) put the same Class description in each one though, just referred in 5619/5643/6695 to a description of the Class in 6634's page.--Patrick Hearn (talk) 20:44, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
