Difference between revisions of "Talk:Severn Valley Railway Timeline 2020-2029"
From SVR Wiki
(9466 running passenger services) |
(thoughts) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does 9466 get an X in the box now it's run passenger services? I can't remember the protocol. Thanks--[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 15:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC) | Does 9466 get an X in the box now it's run passenger services? I can't remember the protocol. Thanks--[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 15:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Good question. I think it started off with the intention of excluding gala guests unless they were already here on hire. However the nearest similar situation was Witherslack Hall in 2016 which arrived for the gala but failed, then worked the next three weekends and did get an X. However 9466 is not really on hire for any length of time so I'd say probably not for now, unless it turns up in this year's mileage table in SVR News (if there is one!). But I'm relaxed either way. --[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 15:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:40, 30 September 2021
Does 9466 get an X in the box now it's run passenger services? I can't remember the protocol. Thanks--Patrick Hearn (talk) 15:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Good question. I think it started off with the intention of excluding gala guests unless they were already here on hire. However the nearest similar situation was Witherslack Hall in 2016 which arrived for the gala but failed, then worked the next three weekends and did get an X. However 9466 is not really on hire for any length of time so I'd say probably not for now, unless it turns up in this year's mileage table in SVRSevern Valley Railway News (if there is one!). But I'm relaxed either way. --Robin (talk) 15:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
