Difference between revisions of "Talk:Severn Valley Railway News"
From SVR Wiki
(Comments on the version before updating today) |
(Potato starch fail) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A couple of comments on the version pre-edit. My copy of SVR News 210 had the normal 64 pages, not the 56 referred to. Also my copy of issue 212 arrived today arrived today (which led to this becoming the featured article!) and was in a brown envelope again rather than potato starch type. All comments, additions and typo corrections welcome as always. --[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 20:03, 14 December 2020 (UTC) | A couple of comments on the version pre-edit. My copy of SVR News 210 had the normal 64 pages, not the 56 referred to. Also my copy of issue 212 arrived today arrived today (which led to this becoming the featured article!) and was in a brown envelope again rather than potato starch type. All comments, additions and typo corrections welcome as always. --[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 20:03, 14 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I think the potato starch failed the test. It was the edition that a fair few didn't get and so appeals were made to contact the railway if members didn't get it. It looks like they've gone back to the previous method. --[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 11:25, 16 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:25, 16 December 2020
A couple of comments on the version pre-edit. My copy of SVRSevern Valley Railway News 210 had the normal 64 pages, not the 56 referred to. Also my copy of issue 212 arrived today arrived today (which led to this becoming the featured article!) and was in a brown envelope again rather than potato starch type. All comments, additions and typo corrections welcome as always. --Robin (talk) 20:03, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- I think the potato starch failed the test. It was the edition that a fair few didn't get and so appeals were made to contact the railway if members didn't get it. It looks like they've gone back to the previous method. --Patrick Hearn (talk) 11:25, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
