Trustworthy, administrator
11,914
edits
Changes
Thoughts
:::And it's even possible to define the sortable value (e.g. numeric date) while displaying different data (e.g. text date) in the cell. Someone's really put a lot of thought in to this. --[[User:Graham Phillips 110|Graham Phillips 110]] ([[User talk:Graham Phillips 110|talk]]) 18:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
::::Thanks for editing these. I was trying to get my head round it!--[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 09:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
==Taking this page forward==
I have added pretty much what I can find from checking SVR Online forum, Society websites and Web Round Ups - isn't there a lot? The page is quite big now too. Some questions please: (1) should we make the tables collapsible? (2) Should we split out diesels into a different page (3) should we through Facebook and forums ask people to contribute additional info? (4) Anything else? Thanks--[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 21:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
:There are still a large number of missing Thomas appearances by 686 which are mentioned in passing in SVR News but not fully listed. Otherwise answers from my POV are (1) Collapsible? No reason not to do so. I'll do it but leave them open by default. They can be closed by default if preferred. (2) Split Diesels? Probably not, unless we find a lot more. It would mean editing the links you've recently added. (3) Forums? I wouldn't worry about it personally, but no objections if you wanted to. (4) Anything else? Once we deviated from a single table, I did ponder whether it would be better split by Loco rather than by decade. On reflection, I'd say leave as is. We could copy the information by loco into a collapsed table on each
lLoco's page, as is already there with the main line appearances. Another one on the long term to do list... --[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 16:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
==Which locos to include==
