Difference between revisions of "Talk:Diesel locomotives at the SVR in preservation"
From SVR Wiki
(updated. Does not (yet) include Class 41/43 power cars but otherwise more or less complete) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | New page updated. Does not (yet) include Class 41/43 power cars but otherwise more or less complete. It coould do with a fresh pair of eyes!--[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 20:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC) | + | New page updated. Does not (yet) include Class 41/43 power cars but otherwise more or less complete. It coould do with a fresh pair of eyes! Edit: For consistency it needs the named locos formatting changed so 08769 [D3937] ''Gladys'' becomes 08769 ''Gladys'' [D3937] --[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 20:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
| + | :Wow! Thanks. Not my area of expertise I hasten to add. A couple of thoughts. Wondering if it is worth sub-dividing the Mainline into [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_Rail_power_classifications BR power classifications] ('BR Type 1', 'BR Type 2', 'BR Type 3', "Modern traction" etc). Also under the 'not included' headings would be incoming railtours (if there have been any - see also steam for the same thought). I'll have a bit more of a detailed look when I have a chance. --[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 14:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::A good idea! | ||
| + | ::I too had incoming railtours in mind. NB where we've said Kidderminster as the trigger for including them, I wonder whether BY would be better? I've had [https://www.sixbellsjunction.co.uk/80s/801220hr.htm 2 * class 25s] to [EDIT]Bewdley South before D1013 took over.--[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 16:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:03, 29 April 2024
New page updated. Does not (yet) include Class 41/43 power cars but otherwise more or less complete. It coould do with a fresh pair of eyes! Edit: For consistency it needs the named locos formatting changed so 08769 [D3937] Gladys becomes 08769 Gladys [D3937] --Patrick Hearn (talk) 20:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Wow! Thanks. Not my area of expertise I hasten to add. A couple of thoughts. Wondering if it is worth sub-dividing the Mainline into BR power classifications ('BRBritish Rail or British Railways Type 1The British Railways classification for diesel locomotives of up to 1000 bhp', 'BRBritish Rail or British Railways Type 2The British Railways classification for diesel locomotives of 1001 bhp to 1499 bhp', 'BRBritish Rail or British Railways Type 3The British Railways classification for diesel locomotives of 1500 bhp to 1999 bhp', "Modern traction" etc). Also under the 'not included' headings would be incoming railtours (if there have been any - see also steam for the same thought). I'll have a bit more of a detailed look when I have a chance. --Robin (talk) 14:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- A good idea!
- I too had incoming railtours in mind. NB where we've said Kidderminster as the trigger for including them, I wonder whether BY would be better? I've had 2 * class 25s to [EDIT]Bewdley South before D1013 took over.--Patrick Hearn (talk) 16:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
