Difference between revisions of "Talk:50031 Consortium Limited"
From SVR Wiki
(Operations / Consortium) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
It's not possible to rename a page. I have "moved" it, which creates a new page and leaves a redirect at the old page. --[[User:Graham Phillips 110|Graham Phillips 110]] ([[User talk:Graham Phillips 110|talk]]) 11:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC) | It's not possible to rename a page. I have "moved" it, which creates a new page and leaves a redirect at the old page. --[[User:Graham Phillips 110|Graham Phillips 110]] ([[User talk:Graham Phillips 110|talk]]) 11:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Seeing that 50031 Consortium Limited only came into existence as a new company this year, I assume it subsequently acquired 50031 from Class Fifty Operations Limited. Browsing around Companies House, I think the role of the Operations company was (is?) to hire the Class 50s from the Alliance and provide them to various TOCs under spot hire arrangements. If so a) is that an ongoing activity and b) is it worth mentioning on the Support Organisations page? Is anyone in contact with Jon Dunster who could presumably clarify? --[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 17:38, 20 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:38, 20 December 2016
I have amended the page (and other pages) to reflect the ownership of 50031 by 50031 Consortium Limited per SVRSevern Valley Railway News 196, but can't seem to amend the title?--Patrick Hearn (talk) 10:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
It's not possible to rename a page. I have "moved" it, which creates a new page and leaves a redirect at the old page. --Graham Phillips 110 (talk) 11:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Seeing that 50031 Consortium Limited only came into existence as a new company this year, I assume it subsequently acquired 50031 from Class Fifty Operations Limited. Browsing around Companies House, I think the role of the Operations company was (is?) to hire the Class 50s from the Alliance and provide them to various TOCs under spot hire arrangements. If so a) is that an ongoing activity and b) is it worth mentioning on the Support Organisations page? Is anyone in contact with Jon Dunster who could presumably clarify? --Robin (talk) 17:38, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
