Trustworthy, administrator
6,661
edits
Changes
5600 class
::My own feeling, 1) 3) and 4) are getting away from the context of the introductory paragraph "...used regularly on scheduled passenger and freight services". In the case of 2) the modern traction would probably have been scheduled but coming via Coalbrookdale and not really using the Severn Valley Branch as such. If we are going to refer to them, I'd suggest a separate section for 'Sundry locomotives' rather than including them with (and possibly detracting from) those used regularly for scheduled services. Apart from Bank Holiday excursion visitors like the Crab, other non-scheduled ones that spring to mind are the two CM&DPLR tanks which were regularly stabled at Kidderminster and things like USATC S160s which worked hospital trains to Stourport.--[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 10:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
:::All good points. Let's leave it--[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 22:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
:5600 Class. I've added the class based on [http://www.miac.org.uk/stourportps.html Adrian Booth's notes] that the class worked Stourport power station trains from 1957. I've also noted the tale they were [[Tales from the Severn Valley#The overweight locomotive|overweight north of Bewdley]]?--[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 12:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
