Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eardington"
From SVR Wiki
m (Some potentially helpful thoughts) |
(answer) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: It may have simply been "Eardington" (no "halt") throughout its time in GWR/BR days, with the BR 1963 summer WTT showing it as such (unlike "Northwood Halt" etc.): [http://www.michaelclemensrailways.co.uk/?atk=574 link]. [http://www.railchronology.free-online.co.uk/EARDINGTON%20summary.htm This page] states that it became "request only" from 1974, so I would presume "halt" was appended in that year or later (note that the linked page has a lot of information we could add here). I might put out a call on Facebook to see if some contemporary evidence (e.g. timetables with the name printed on) exists showing such a change. | : It may have simply been "Eardington" (no "halt") throughout its time in GWR/BR days, with the BR 1963 summer WTT showing it as such (unlike "Northwood Halt" etc.): [http://www.michaelclemensrailways.co.uk/?atk=574 link]. [http://www.railchronology.free-online.co.uk/EARDINGTON%20summary.htm This page] states that it became "request only" from 1974, so I would presume "halt" was appended in that year or later (note that the linked page has a lot of information we could add here). I might put out a call on Facebook to see if some contemporary evidence (e.g. timetables with the name printed on) exists showing such a change. | ||
: Regarding names, I ''think'' we generally go without "station" for other locations ("Bridgnorth" rather than "Bridgnorth station"), but I'm not aware of any definite choice of style having been chosen. --[[User:Danny252|Danny252]] ([[User talk:Danny252|talk]]) 11:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC) | : Regarding names, I ''think'' we generally go without "station" for other locations ("Bridgnorth" rather than "Bridgnorth station"), but I'm not aware of any definite choice of style having been chosen. --[[User:Danny252|Danny252]] ([[User talk:Danny252|talk]]) 11:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::There's a note that "Trains can not be crossed at Eardington or Linley" [http://www.svrwiki.com/Timetable:_Severn_Valley_Line_1948 here] and, unlike Northwood etc., it's not identified as a halt, which suggests it was classified as a station in 1948. And in 1962/63, [http://www.michaelclemensrailways.co.uk/article/severn-valley-much-wenlock-tenbury/496 tickets] were issued for "Eardington" as against "Cound Halt". | ||
| + | ::Maybe just go for the generally accepted definition of a Halt as having no staff and no goods facilities and mention that it has never been officially downgraded (if that is the case) but is usually referred to as a Halt now that it fits that description. | ||
Revision as of 12:19, 23 March 2017
There is a mix on this wiki of Eardington station and halt. When was the term "halt" officially used, and should we use Eardington or Eardington station more consistently?--Patrick Hearn (talk) 10:49, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- It may have simply been "Eardington" (no "halt") throughout its time in GWRGreat Western Railway/BRBritish Rail or British Railways days, with the BRBritish Rail or British Railways 1963 summer WTTWorking Timetable showing it as such (unlike "Northwood Halt" etc.): link. This page states that it became "request only" from 1974, so I would presume "halt" was appended in that year or later (note that the linked page has a lot of information we could add here). I might put out a call on Facebook to see if some contemporary evidence (e.g. timetables with the name printed on) exists showing such a change.
- Regarding names, I think we generally go without "station" for other locations ("Bridgnorth" rather than "Bridgnorth station"), but I'm not aware of any definite choice of style having been chosen. --Danny252 (talk) 11:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- There's a note that "Trains can not be crossed at Eardington or Linley" here and, unlike Northwood etc., it's not identified as a halt, which suggests it was classified as a station in 1948. And in 1962/63, tickets were issued for "Eardington" as against "Cound Halt".
- Maybe just go for the generally accepted definition of a Halt as having no staff and no goods facilities and mention that it has never been officially downgraded (if that is the case) but is usually referred to as a Halt now that it fits that description.
