Talk:Image Collections: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Created page with "Regarding the dates on the David Cooke photos, David has said that the dates were not recorded in every case, and some are simply best guesses. Therefore don't worry too much..." |
Rostance and Hindley |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Regarding the dates on the David Cooke photos, David has said that the dates were not recorded in every case, and some are simply best guesses. Therefore don't worry too much if a date seems to disagree with other sources! --[[User:Danny252|Danny252]] ([[User talk:Danny252|talk]]) 14:34, 25 November 2015 (UTC) |
Regarding the dates on the David Cooke photos, David has said that the dates were not recorded in every case, and some are simply best guesses. Therefore don't worry too much if a date seems to disagree with other sources! --[[User:Danny252|Danny252]] ([[User talk:Danny252|talk]]) 14:34, 25 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
Would the SVR be able to use Rostance and Hindley images in a newsletter, does anyone know please?--[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 22:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:22, 29 March 2020
Regarding the dates on the David Cooke photos, David has said that the dates were not recorded in every case, and some are simply best guesses. Therefore don't worry too much if a date seems to disagree with other sources! --Danny252 (talk) 14:34, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Would the SVR be able to use Rostance and Hindley images in a newsletter, does anyone know please?--Patrick Hearn (talk) 22:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)