Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gradient profile and mileages"

From SVR Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Robin moved page Talk:Gradient profile to Talk:Gradient profile and mileages: Mileage info expanded but kept on same page)
(Speculation on why mileposts on OS maps and ELRs disagree)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Mostly as a reminder to myself, there are several "authentic" gradient diagrams in signal boxes along the line that might make nice additions to this page, and Hampton Loade (I think?) has one for the Bridgnorth-Shrewsbury section as a bonus. --[[User:Danny252|Danny252]] ([[User talk:Danny252|talk]]) 19:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 
Mostly as a reminder to myself, there are several "authentic" gradient diagrams in signal boxes along the line that might make nice additions to this page, and Hampton Loade (I think?) has one for the Bridgnorth-Shrewsbury section as a bonus. --[[User:Danny252|Danny252]] ([[User talk:Danny252|talk]]) 19:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 +
 +
It has been puzzling me for some time that the OS maps at the turn of the century show mileposts which do not come close to matching the [[Engineer's Line References|ELRs]], being almost half a mile from where they should be. It just occurred to me that the reason might be because the reversal might have been at Bewdley rather than Kidderminster. Measuring the relevant distances on that basis appears to be a perfect fit, hence the somewhat speculative note I have added. Any firm evidence to support this assumption would be welcome.--[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 16:47, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:47, 19 March 2018

Mostly as a reminder to myself, there are several "authentic" gradient diagrams in signal boxes along the line that might make nice additions to this page, and Hampton Loade (I think?) has one for the Bridgnorth-Shrewsbury section as a bonus. --Danny252 (talk) 19:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

It has been puzzling me for some time that the OSOrdnance Survey maps at the turn of the century show mileposts which do not come close to matching the ELRs, being almost half a mile from where they should be. It just occurred to me that the reason might be because the reversal might have been at Bewdley rather than Kidderminster. Measuring the relevant distances on that basis appears to be a perfect fit, hence the somewhat speculative note I have added. Any firm evidence to support this assumption would be welcome.--Robin (talk) 16:47, 19 March 2018 (UTC)