Difference between revisions of "Talk:Foot crossing off Northwood Lane"
From SVR Wiki
(Footbridge at this location?) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm a bit confused by the reference to a footbridge at this crossing. There was a footbridge nearer Bewdley which connected Summer Hill to Northwood lane, which is visible on both the 1903 and 1927 maps next to the field numbered 259. The Northwood lane crossing is where the footpath crosses the south side of field 260 and then turns northwards up the side of field 234 east of the line. I can't see a footbridge there on the earlier map - there isn't much evidence of the crossing either come to that. Am I missing something? --[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 22:41, 9 April 2022 (UTC) | I'm a bit confused by the reference to a footbridge at this crossing. There was a footbridge nearer Bewdley which connected Summer Hill to Northwood lane, which is visible on both the 1903 and 1927 maps next to the field numbered 259. The Northwood lane crossing is where the footpath crosses the south side of field 260 and then turns northwards up the side of field 234 east of the line. I can't see a footbridge there on the earlier map - there isn't much evidence of the crossing either come to that. Am I missing something? --[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 22:41, 9 April 2022 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Sorry. My mistake. All this time I've thought they were at the same location, when I should have looked at the map properly. Edit undone. --[[User:Graham Phillips 110|Graham Phillips 110]] ([[User talk:Graham Phillips 110|talk]]) 07:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:43, 10 April 2022
I'm a bit confused by the reference to a footbridge at this crossing. There was a footbridge nearer Bewdley which connected Summer Hill to Northwood lane, which is visible on both the 1903 and 1927 maps next to the field numbered 259. The Northwood lane crossing is where the footpath crosses the south side of field 260 and then turns northwards up the side of field 234 east of the line. I can't see a footbridge there on the earlier map - there isn't much evidence of the crossing either come to that. Am I missing something? --Robin (talk) 22:41, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry. My mistake. All this time I've thought they were at the same location, when I should have looked at the map properly. Edit undone. --Graham Phillips 110 (talk) 07:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
